Tuesday, March 27, 2007

EVRO VIZIJA



Ambasada SR Nemačke, obradovala je VIPovce, novinare i građane odlično koncipiranim koncertom koji je održan u Sava Centru povodom pedesetogodišnjice začetka ideje o EU (podsetićemo, 25. marta 1957., održan je prvi samit šest važnih evropskih zemalja, čime je započet projekat Unije - današnja Evropa je jedinstveno tržište za više od 500 miliona stanovnika ).

Koncert je osmišljen kao muzičko putovanje kroz Evropu, uz pomoć Simfonijskog orkestra i hora RTS, koji ove godine slave sedamdeset godina rada. Čuli smo odlomke najpopularnijih dela Hendla, Mocarta, Vagnera, Bizea, Verdija itd. Događaj je bio dinamičan i zabavan, a to vam kaže neko ko (svojevoljno) nije bio na koncertu klasične muzike od 1987., kada je Pogorelić svirao Čajkovskog, takođe u SC ( tad sam išla dva dana, zbog Ive, naravno, a moj afinitet za Petra Iliča došao je kasnije, kao kolateral. Pogorelić je ostario, oćelavio i udebljao se do granice neprepoznavanja, a P.I. Čajkovski ostaje fresh&exciting – i ne samo kada ga Ričard Čemberlen igra kod Kena Rasela u briljantnom The Music lovers, već i kao kompozitor:- ).

Anyway. Nije AGIT POP ovde zbog lepe muzike ili insieme, unite unite Europe. Još manje smo tu da bi se urednica ofirala kako je išla da sluša klasiku zbog simpatija prema izvođačima...Neki malo- građanskije nastrojeni mogu da izbrišu naš blog iz favorita zbog ove izjave. Ne, ne, ne. Fokusirali smo se na ono "diplomatsko neizrecivo" u sadrzajima govora koje smo imali priliku da chujemo.

Na samom početku večeri pod nazivom TOGETHER 1957., obratili su nam se
domaćini – NJ.E. Andreas Cobel, ambasador SR Nemačke, trenutno predsedavajuće zemlje EU, zatim Boris Tadić ( svi znamo ko je to! ) i šef delegacije EU u Srbiji Žozep Ljoveras, a ono sto su oni rekli zvuchalo je kao teza-antiteza-sinteza, kako to vec ide u osnovima dijalektike.
Prvo smo, od Ambasadora, čuli kako je „Srbiji mesto u EU“, onda je vostao Predsednik pa je podsetio na teške dane koji predstoje glede Kosova ( samo što je šteta što u muzički potpuri kasnije nije ubačena i večita „...tebi se vraćam ponovo, ko da mi otme iz moje duše...“ ), ali se Predsednik osvrnuo i na mrsku nam godišnjicu NATO bombardovanja. Hm. U prvim redovima- Mićun, Ružica, Čanak, Gorica, Neša B., Aligruda, Vladeta, Nesuđeni Mandatar, plus Svilanović, popovi- katolički i orodoxni, Prokić, novi Jovanović iz LDP, ali i veliki broj predstavnika baš tih zemalja što „vršiše agresiju“. Ima neko istraživanje koje čitah, malo pošto ovi vršiše, u kome je pisalo sledeće: da nije NATO bombardovao, srpska ekonomija ne bi oslabila do te mere da više nema svinjice i kupusa, ne bi se digla kuka&motika&otpor i ne bi bilo 5.oktobra ili bi ga bilo tek par godina kasnije.
Ne mogu sad da vam linkujem link ( to je bilo početkom 2001. ) ali nije nemoguće. I sad, zašto baš to spominjati, na proslavi EU, stvarno mi nije jasno. Mislim, ako uzmemo to istraživanje za validno, možda Boris T. ne bi bio tu gde je sad. Cilj opravdava sredstvo dokle god postoji nešto što opravdava cilj. I ovde ću završiti.

Poenta – Nemci kažu man’te se šovinizma, vidite kako smo mi lepo daleko dogurali, onda Predsednik antitezuje, ok, ali Kosovo, ali bombardovanje, da bi Portugalac zavrshio poukom: granice na Kopu ili malo dole, sve će biti isto kad čoporativno uđete u EU. Lepo i pametno rečeno.

I to je najbolja vizija Evrope koju možemo da imamo. Evro Vizija: BORDERS ARE SOOOO OVERRATED!!!!!
PS: Meni su, onako ljudski, zasmetale dve stvari:
1. Zashto svi sinoc prisutni, pri izlasku iz sale, nisu dobili multi shengensku vizu na godinu dana?
2. Zashto je na samom kraju, kada je orkestar izvodio muziku iz domacih filmova, zaobidjen soundtrack iz Otpisanih? Da li smo mi, partizani, sad odjednom postali shugavi?

7 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

bravo kacanovicka.
ko svaku rec da si tri puta merila
i izmerila kako treba!!!!

1:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

šef delegacije eu komisije je portugalac, a ne španac i zove se žozep, a ne žozef.

XXX

mašnica

ps serbia - portugal 1:1

11:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

E pa to je greshka lista Politika, odakle smo preneli imena...
Mi cemo ispraviti, a oni ne mogu.

11:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sve je to ESPANA!!!!

12:04 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

sve je to ESPANA kojoj ce kruzok dodeliti 12 poena 12. maja.
peca cita glasove iz studija u jevremovoj.

12:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague Court Cannot Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case

picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa/
(The Documentary Secret United Nations ICC Meeting Papers Scanned Images)

This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges against Dr Karadzic and others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not.

Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations member states instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the, Radovan Karadzic, as with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally witnessed these United Nations member states openly speaking about trading judicial appointments and verdicts for financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings at the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable trying Radovan Karazdic and others.

I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001 Preparatory Meetings to establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact caliber of criminal corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a perfectly viable topic of legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate trading verdicts AND judicial appointments, for monetary funding.

Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her country’s proposal was not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in a particularly loud and noticably strongly vocal manner, “Spain (my country) strongly believes if we contribute most financial support to the Hague’s highest court, that ought to give us and other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its decisions.”

((((((((((((((((((((((((( ((((((((((((((((((((((((( Instead of censoring the country representative from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair judicial idea of bribery for international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all country representatives present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as a ”totally legitimate topic” discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I was quite shocked!
The idea was "let's discuss it." "It's a great topic to discuss."

Some countries agreed with Spain’s propositions while others did not. The point here is, bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated as a totally legitimate topic instead of an illegitimate toic which it is in the meeting that I attended in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly emergent international criminal court.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

In particular., since "Spain" was so overtly unafraid in bringing up this topic of trading financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial appointments and verdicts in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN, "Spain" must have already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was "socially acceptable" for conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing the ICTY and
ICC before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological honor student. SPAIN's diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as, Serbia, in all of this is, disgusting morally!

SPAIN HAS TAUGHT THE WORLD THE TRUE DEFINITION OF AN
"INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT."

I represented the state interests' of the Former Yugoslavia, in Darko Trifunovic’s absence in those meetings and I am proud to undertake this effort on Serbia’s behalf.

11:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Irrefutable Proof ICTY Is Corrupt Court/Irrefutable Proof the Hague Court Cannot Legitimately Prosecute Karadzic Case

picasaweb.google.com/lpcyusa/
(The Documentary Secret United Nations ICC Meeting Papers Scanned Images)

This legal technicality indicates the Hague must dismiss charges against Dr Karadzic and others awaiting trials in the Hague jail; like it or not.

Unfortunately for the Signatures Of the Rome Statute United Nations member states instituting the ICC & ICTY housed at the Hague, insofar as the, Radovan Karadzic, as with the other Hague cases awaiting trial there, I personally witnessed these United Nations member states openly speaking about trading judicial appointments and verdicts for financial funding when I attended the 2001 ICC Preparatory Meetings at the UN in Manhattan making the iCTY and ICC morally incapable trying Radovan Karazdic and others.

I witnessed with my own eyes and ears when attending the 2001 Preparatory Meetings to establish an newly emergent International Criminal Court, the exact caliber of criminal corruption running so very deeply at the Hague, that it was a perfectly viable topic of legitimate conversation in those meetings I attended to debate trading verdicts AND judicial appointments, for monetary funding.

Jilly wrote:*The rep from Spain became distraught and when her country’s proposal was not taken to well by the chair of the meeting , then Spain argued in a particularly loud and noticably strongly vocal manner, “Spain (my country) strongly believes if we contribute most financial support to the Hague’s highest court, that ought to give us and other countries feeding it financially MORE direct power over its decisions.”

((((((((((((((((((((((((( ((((((((((((((((((((((((( Instead of censoring the country representative from Spain for even bringing up this unjust, illegal and unfair judicial idea of bribery for international judicial verdicts and judicial appointments, all country representatives present in the meeting that day all treated the Spain proposition as a ”totally legitimate topic” discussed and debated it between each other for some time. I was quite shocked!
The idea was "let's discuss it." "It's a great topic to discuss."

Some countries agreed with Spain’s propositions while others did not. The point here is, bribery for judicial verdicts and judicial appointments was treated as a totally legitimate topic instead of an illegitimate toic which it is in the meeting that I attended in 2001 that day to establish the ground work for a newly emergent international criminal court.))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

In particular., since "Spain" was so overtly unafraid in bringing up this topic of trading financial funding the ICC for influence over its future judicial appointments and verdicts in front of every other UN member state present that day at the UN, "Spain" must have already known by previous experience the topic of bribery was "socially acceptable" for conversation that day. They must have previously spoke about bribing the ICTY and
ICC before in meetings; this is my take an international sociological honor student. SPAIN's diplomatic gesture of international justice insofar as, Serbia, in all of this is, disgusting morally!

SPAIN HAS TAUGHT THE WORLD THE TRUE DEFINITION OF AN
"INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT."

I represented the state interests' of the Former Yugoslavia, in Darko Trifunovic’s absence in those meetings and I am proud to undertake this effort on Serbia’s behalf.

11:31 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home